With spring about to be sprung, the temperatures are bound to increase. The Consumer Guide to Home Energy Savings (via Care2) has a few tips for keeping your home cool while keeping a precious few bills in your pocket. Here are a few:
How do the agents here at Paragon plan and execute an equally important mission: finding you a property that you’ll love and enjoy for years to come, getting it for you at the best possible price and terms, meanwhile making the process as smooth, straightforward and stress-free as possible while managing the transaction so that you are fully aware of the condition and circumstances of the property you purchase?
Here’s a few of the ways we do this:
Today we conclude our look at the Paragon report titled 10 Factors Behind San Francisco’s Real Estate Market. Here are the last of those factors:
Questions? Get in touch.
When last we met, we began to discuss the Paragon report titled 10 Factors Behind San Francisco’s Real Estate Market. Let’s continue to look at these factors, shall we?
What are the main factors at play in determining the San Francisco real estate market? That’s what the folks at Paragon wanted to know, hence this report titled 10 Factors Behind San Francisco’s Real Estate Market. (Original name, don’t you think?)
Specifically, as the report notes, some of these “reflect general macro-economic trends and some … are specific to the city itself.” It goes on to state that in 1989, 2001 and 2008, many of those factors stalled or even went into reverse rapidly due to a large, negative, economic, political or even ecological event such as the Loma Prieta earthquake. The most current version was updated at year-end 2015.
So with no further ado, let’s start to look at these factors:
We’ll continue this discussion next time, when we’ll pinpoint more factors behind the market.
The San Francisco Chronicle reports that the San Francisco Supervisors have, after much contentious debate, voted unanimously this week to place on the June ballot a charter amendment requiring developers to sell and rent a quarter of units in new projects at below market-rate prices.
The measure has over time been opposed by several parties – mayor Ed Lee, developers, construction trade unions and several moderate-leaning supervisors – and so Tuesday’s unanimous vote comes as a bit of a surprise. The opposing parties had said that the 25 percent below-market requirement, which more than doubles the current 12 percent requirement, would damage the housing market to the degree that it would actually make for less affordable housing as a result. The measure’s authors, Supervisors Jane Kim and Aaron Peskin, were dismissive of those claims.
“In the end, all 11 supervisors got behind the measure, even if some did so grudgingly,” the Chron reported. “There were political and practical reasons for doing so. Politically, voting against more affordable housing simply doesn’t look good in a city where affordability is a huge concern.”
However, that 25 percent requirement may not hold. The figure could be lowered either project-by-project or citywide, according to a resolution between the mayor and the measure’s authors that says by April 19, the Board of Supervisors is to pass legislation including a grandfathering clause that could exclude developments that are already in the works.
Supervisor Norman Yee, who helped make the deal a reality, told the Chron that he “really want(s) to have this resolution as a companion to the Charter to let people know I am serious.” Stay tuned.
We know that the market is tough, but data recently reported by Paragon – and profiled in the San Francisco Chronicle – really brings this fact into relief. Paragon’s recent San Francisco Bay Area Housing Affordability Report finds that, despite the first drop in home values since 2011 (as seen at year-end 2015), real estate prices in the city are still hitting record highs. This translates to record lows in terms of affordability – in fact, only 8 percent of households are earning enough to afford these price tags.
The Chron quoted the report thusly: “The California Association of Realtors just released its Housing Affordability Index (HAI) for the 4th quarter of 2015, which measures the percentage of households that can afford to buy the median priced single family dwelling (house) – and San Francisco is now 3 percentage points above its all-time low of 8 percent, last reached in Q3 2007.”
Three factors affect affordability according to the HAI analysis: median house price, mortgage interest rates and household income. The Paragon analysis incorporated local data compared across neighborhood, city, county, and country. The chart that accompanies this post further breaks down in detail the exact affordability across the metro area. It’s a sobering read for many.
But here’s a few important things to consider, as outlined in the Paragon report:
Questions? Get in touch.
Previously we started dissecting Paragon’s report on affordability by San Francisco neighborhood. Today we’re going to conclude that conversation by talking about slightly more expensive homes in the city.
If you’re looking to spend $1 million to $1.5 million, you’ll find prospects in the west and central-south parts of the city, including Central Sunset and Parkside, Golden Gate Heights, Miraloma Park, Sunnyside, Bernal Heights and Mission Terrace. As the report notes, the past two years have seen quite a bit of upward pressure on these areas.
You’ll find most condo and co-op sales in this price range around the areas including South Beach, Inner Mission, Hayes Valley, Dogpatch and South of Market, as well as in more high-end neighborhoods such as Pacific Heights, Russian Hill and the greater Noe-Eureka Valleys area. This is largely thanks to the arrival of newer condo developments that have surged onto the market over the past decade to decade and a half.
Now let’s get down to the higher figures — $2 million to $2.5 million. When you get up here, the market becomes dominated by the greater Noe-Eureka-Cole Valleys district, the St. Francis Wood-Forest Hill district, the Potrero Hill-Inner Mission area, and the Inner-Central Richmond and Lake Street area.
Then there’s the luxury market, otherwise known as homes selling for $2.5 million and above and condos, co-ops and TICs selling for $1.5 and above. (This is San Francisco, which is not necessarily your father’s luxury market.) These millions play differently depending on neighborhood. Factors that play significant roles include views, which are particularly important in the luxury condo market. The ultra-high end in the city is dominated by the northern neighborhoods such as Pacific Heights, where you’ll see houses selling for $5 million and above. You’ll find the most luxury condo sales in the greater South Beach-Yerba Buena area.
For prevailing SF median house and condo prices, Paragon’s interactive map of neighborhood values can be found here: SF Neighborhood Home-Price Map.